Research study 02 / Verb morphology

One action, many forms: agreement and time in Mombasa Kutchi

Eight verb paradigms suggest recurring distinctions in person, gender and number. Past forms and negative constructions also reveal unresolved patterns.

Abstract editorial illustration of repeating arcs diverging into different paths, representing related verb forms.
Original editorial illustration; not an archival photograph or linguistic source.

This study compares forms of kar (‘do’), kan (‘take’) and six other verbs across recorded subjects. Several forms suggest agreement for person, gender and number, while some past forms show changes beyond a single suffix. The tables retain complete speaker-attested forms because their internal segmentation remains under study.

Section 01

Person, gender and number in the present

The verb kan (‘take’) provides comparable forms across subjects. The elicitation records masculine and feminine singular forms, person differences and plural forms. Similar patterns appear with other verbs, even where the stem itself varies.

SubjectAttested form of kanReading
I · masculinekana(n)thoI am taking
I · femininekana(n)thiI am taking
You · masculinekane(n)thoYou are taking
You · femininekane(n)thiYou are taking
HekanethoHe is taking
ShekanethiShe is taking
Wekano(n)thaaWe are taking
Theykane(n)thaaThey are taking
Complete forms are speaker-attested; the boundaries between stem and ending have not been proven.

Forms such as kara(n)tho and kana(n)tho, or suma(n)thi and kana(n)thi, suggest recurring agreement patterns. Their internal divisions between stem and ending remain unconfirmed, so full recorded words are given in the table.

Section 02

An ongoing action and an everyday habit

The same finite form in two contexts

Ongoing action
au(n) suma(n)tho
I am sleeping.
Habitual action
au(n) haroj suma(n)tho
I sleep every day.
Ongoing action
au(n) vina(n)tho
I am going.
Habitual action
au(n) haroj vina(n)tho
I go every day.

The same recorded present form can express an ongoing action or a regular habit. Haroj (‘every day’) changes the time interpretation without changing the verb. These endings should not yet be described as exclusively progressive.

Section 03

The past does not look like one simple suffix

Au(n) kaal oosyose
I went yesterday. (masculine speaker)
au(n) kaal ooseise
I went yesterday. (feminine speaker)
paa(n) kaal oosyasee
We went yesterday.
hinee kaal suthyaa
They slept yesterday.

The past forms require separate analysis. Vin (‘go’) has vina(n)tho in the present and oosyose in one masculine first-person past context; sum (‘sleep’) has suma(n)tho and suthose. These contrasts cannot be explained by attaching a single suffix without additional evidence.

Section 04

Future meaning and the grammar of not

Savare au(n) kandhose
I will take it tomorrow.
Savare he ghare vendhee
She will go home tomorrow.
Natho sume
He is not sleeping.
Nathi sume
She is not sleeping.
Paa(n) kaal na oosyasee
We did not go yesterday.
Nah sum!
Don't sleep!

Several first-person future forms contain -dhose, but ‘she will go home tomorrow’ was translated with vendhee. The first-person pattern cannot yet be generalized to every subject. The negative examples also show distinct natho, nathi, na and nah environments.

Section 05

Before building a general conjugation engine

The verb tables record attested forms rather than providing a productive conjugation engine. Repeated elicitation with other speakers is needed before the patterns can be generalized, particularly where stem changes are irregular.

Questions for further elicitation

  1. Test feminine and plural future forms for the same three verbs.
  2. Compare ordinary present negatives against affirmative verbs in every person.
  3. Elicit habitual, progressive and completed meanings in identical contexts.
  4. Check the variation dhor/dor and the pronunciation of the (n) notation.

Lexical notes

Words in this study

Word notes record meanings in their sentence contexts. Select a word for its contextual meaning and to search the public dictionary. Some entries remain under review.

kar
Do, perform.
kan
Take.
sum
Sleep.
vin
Go.
dhor
Run.
haroj
Every day.
savare
Tomorrow, in the supplied examples.
kaal
Yesterday, in the supplied examples.

Source & method

How this article was prepared

The published material includes native-speaker sentences, translation pairs and grammaticality judgments, including a 48-sentence questionnaire (Study 007), earlier verb and case comparisons, and targeted studies of possession and negation (Studies 008–011). Original forms remain visible, with a working (n)-before-th display spelling where indicated.

These analyses are preliminary, not claims about every Kutchi speaker or variety. Evidence from Mombasa is not automatically treated as confirmation for Ethiopian Kutchi. The research has not been peer reviewed or independently validated across multiple speakers. Issue dates organize the 2026 series and do not indicate earlier online publication; the articles first appeared online in October 2026.

Continue reading · Study 03

From chokro to chokra: number, gender and distance

All research articles